Kerchner v Obama, attorney Mario Apuzzo, US Constitution, standing, immunity, July 4, 2009
On February 2, 2009, attorney Mario Apuzzo filed a lawsuit for plaintiff, Charles Kerchner and others against
Barack Obama and other defendants. Here are some exercpts from the lawsuit. Please read it in entirety
for a better understanding.
“Plaintiff, Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., is a citizen of the United States and a
resident of the State of Pennsylvania. He served 33 years in the U.S. Naval Reserves as
both a Commissioned Officer and an Enlisted person.”
“It is plaintiffs duty to support and defend the United
States Constitution pursuant to that oath. Additionally, while currently not statutorily
subject to recall, by Executive Order of the President or an act of Congress in an extreme
national emergency, the President and/or Congress could order people in plaintiffs status
of service to be recalled. Should plaintiff be recalled to active duty, he would need to
know whether the President and Commander in Chief who may be giving him orders is in
fact the legitimate President and Commander in Chief and therefore obligate him to
follow those orders or risk being prosecuted for disobeying such legitimate orders.”
“To date, no state or federal election official, nor any government authority,
has investigated or held hearings and verified that Obama ever established and proved
conclusively that he is an Article II natural born Citizen.
The defendants have requested more time and received it. Their latest ploy alleges that the plaintiffs have no
standing and that the defendants have immunity. On June 28, 2009, Charles Kurchner and Mario Apuzzo were
interviewed on the Chalice radio show. This video includes some clips from the audio and some documents from
the legal wrangling.
Listen to the Apuzzo/Kerchener audio beginning @ 82:00 minutes
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/PatriotsHeartNetwork/2009/06/29/The-Chalice-Show.mp3?guid=1ca3a577-5720-4bd9-96f1-9b68f7b2027d
View the court documents at Mario Apuzzo’s website:
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
Listen to the Chalice show here:
http://www.patriotsheartnetwork.com/
To learn more about natural born citizen and other Obama issues visit:
http://citizenwells.wordpress.com
Clarification of original filing timeline (provided by ramjet767)
To the Editor:
Just noticed another important point both in your article and in the accompanying YouTube video description paragraph and in the video itself on a slide. The Kerchner et al vs. Obama & Congress et al lawsuit was filed very early in the morning of 20 Jan 2009, 9+ hours before he was sworn in, not in February. It was later amended twice with the latest amendment, the 2nd Amended Complaint being filed on 9 Feb 2009. See the copy of the 2nd Amended Case filing document headline which clarifies that the original suit was filed on 20 Jan 2009. You can see that in the headline at this link:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/11317148/
Duration : 0:4:38
Tagged with: 2009 • attorney • Barack Obama • Barry Soetoro • cheney • Citizen Wells • House of Representatives • Immunity • July 4 • Kerchner v Obama • lawsuit • Mario Apuzzo • Nancy Pelosi • natural born citizen • not eligible • president elect • standing • United States of America • US Congress • US Constitution • US president
Filed under: Natural Immunity
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!

Thanks, I just wish …
Thanks, I just wish this vid clip was longer, but at least you give the link in the right & the helpful note to skip to the 82:00 minute mark — I’d started listening before but gave up after so long & still no Kerchner case stuff.